...but the one who doesn't have to change.

-s.popov

Universe in motion

Universe is constantly changing, therefore our knowledge about the universe must change with it. It is hard to imagine that we can have the absolute knowledge of the universe, for the same reason.
-s.popov

Adaptation

Adaptation is a way, not a destination.
-s.popov

Changes must be treated as an expense

The question is what's more expensive, change or no change?

...but the one who complies with ever new requirements

...but the one who can get through the change.

,... but the one who can adjust to new conditions.

only when necessary

Adaptation vs Change

Those two are not the same, you can change as much as you want but still lose because of inability to adapt. Now the one who adapts to change(or their environment) is going to inherit the future, and/or succeed

Change and Adaptation

Change is my favorite word. Changes create opportunities. Change makes sense, and applies to everything more or less. Objectivism helped to understand reality, but it is rigid, unadaptable, when throw Change into equation, it makes much more sense. Now what am I going to do about it? Take advantage? Use for my purposes? Imply it on others? Stay with it? Bend?

Adaptation is bigger than universe...my mind is completely consumed by it now, is that about to change?